QZ8501初步报告：客机出事时由副机师驾驶

30-1-2015 10:07 AM| 发布者: 佳礼记者 | 评论: 11|原作者: Lc919

摘要: 印尼国家运输安全委员会周四称，上月坠毁的印尼亚航客机在事故发生时，是由副机师在操控飞机...

印尼国家运输安全委员会周四称，上月坠毁的印尼亚航客机在事故发生时，是由副机师在操控飞机。
委员会首席调查员Mardjono Siswosuwarno对记者表示，从爪哇海底找到的飞行数据记录器为调查人员提供了亚航QZ8501客机最后时刻的“清晰图景”。“通常坐在驾驶舱右侧的副驾驶当时正在驾驶飞机”，Mardjono说道。

全文： http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/287735

看来接下来亚航在印尼可能会受到打压吧

生气

惊讶

难过

好笑

无聊

刚表态过的朋友 (1 人)

匿名

收藏分享邀请

上一篇：条例严格需等太久雇主转聘非法女佣下一篇：大宝森节游行和马拉松：隆部分路段2月1日关闭

发表评论 | 在论坛留言

最新评论

引用 kclo51 29-1-2015 08:19 PM: 难道当时由正机师驾驶，情况就不一样。。。？？

引用某某某某 29-1-2015 11:27 PM: 有啥问题？副机师不驾飞机，那他是公司请来坐着看风景？

引用破坏天才 30-1-2015 09:16 AM: 之前有报道说，上升速度太快了？可能资历比较浅的关系？

引用 jvcpcv55 30-1-2015 10:01 AM: 破坏天才发表于 30-1-2015 09:16 AM
之前有报道说，上升速度太快了？可能资历比较浅的关系？

There's a lot of nonsense being banded about regarding this flight.
First up, we are not talking about sustained, powered climb rates. If you're travelling at Mach 0.85 and pull up vertically, in theory (if your plane didn't break) you'd climb at an initial rate of nearly Mach 0.85 (your original speed minus the airspeed loss when pulling up).... That's near enough 57,000 feet/minute.
If you're at high speed and willing to trade speed for altitude, an Airbus A320 is physically capable of climbing at much higher rates than 6000 feet per minute.... At least until it runs out of airspeed.
A fighter is the only aircraft which would be likely to perform a sustained 6000ft/minute climb rate in normal use, but they're also capable of much higher rates of climb.
The maximum rate of climb you'd see in an A320 in normal use is in the 2000 ft/min range, but that's because it's the highest reasonably efficient rate of climb. That's not the maximum the aircraft is capable of under power (closer to 3000 ft/min), and is absolutely no indication of that maximum unsustained climb rate.
It would eventually stall at any unsustainable rate of climb, but then again, so would any aircraft even at a sustainable rate... Keep climbing and before too long you run out of atmosphere.
Either way, there is nothing to say that climbing above the sustained climb rate for an aircraft is unsafe or, necessarily, unusual. You trade airspeed for altitude, sure, but if you need to be higher at that moment in time, there's plenty of time to accelerate again later.
From Airlines.Net:
The three are roughly the same at 10,000', at about 2500 fpm. (Maybe a bit more for a light A319, and less for a full A321)
Normal climb rates from 10,000' to about 30,000 are as follows:
A319, 3000 fpm to about 1500 at 30,000'
A320, 2200 fpm to about 1000 at 30,000'
A321, 1400 fpm to about 500 at 30,000'
TL;DR - The official is spouting nonsense s/he doesn't understand. A fighter is the only aircraft likely to be able to (or wish to) climb at a 6000 ft/minute SUSTAINED climb rate, but almost any aircraft can climb at that rate for brief durations in a zoom climb - converting airspeed/momentum to altitude

有时别太信官员的话啊！！！！