佳礼资讯网

 找回密码
 注册

ADVERTISEMENT

查看: 3400|回复: 11

QZ8501初步报告已呈 , 出事时是由副机师驾驶

[复制链接]
发表于 29-1-2015 08:02 PM | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
印尼国家运输安全委员会周四称,上月坠毁的印尼亚航客机在事故发生时,是由副机师在操控飞机。
委员会首席调查员Mardjono Siswosuwarno对记者表示,从爪哇海底找到的飞行数据记录器为调查人员提供了亚航QZ8501客机最后时刻的“清晰图景”。“通常坐在驾驶舱右侧的副驾驶当时正在驾驶飞机”,Mardjono说道。




全文 : http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/287735

看来接下来亚航在印尼可能会受到打压吧


回复

使用道具 举报


ADVERTISEMENT

发表于 29-1-2015 08:19 PM | 显示全部楼层
难道当时由正机师驾驶,情况就不一样。。。??

评分

参与人数 1人气 +1 收起 理由
upm + 1 我很赞同

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 29-1-2015 11:27 PM 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
有啥问题?副机师不驾飞机,那他是公司请来坐着看风景?

评分

参与人数 1人气 +1 收起 理由
upm + 1 恶意灌水

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 30-1-2015 09:16 AM | 显示全部楼层
之前有报道说,上升速度太快了?可能资历比较浅的关系?
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 30-1-2015 10:01 AM | 显示全部楼层
破坏天才 发表于 30-1-2015 09:16 AM
之前有报道说,上升速度太快了?可能资历比较浅的关系?

There's a lot of nonsense being banded about regarding this flight.
First up, we are not talking about sustained, powered climb rates. If you're travelling at Mach 0.85 and pull up vertically, in theory (if your plane didn't break) you'd climb at an initial rate of nearly Mach 0.85 (your original speed minus the airspeed loss when pulling up).... That's near enough 57,000 feet/minute.
If you're at high speed and willing to trade speed for altitude, an Airbus A320 is physically capable of climbing at much higher rates than 6000 feet per minute.... At least until it runs out of airspeed.
A fighter is the only aircraft which would be likely to perform a sustained 6000ft/minute climb rate in normal use, but they're also capable of much higher rates of climb.
The maximum rate of climb you'd see in an A320 in normal use is in the 2000 ft/min range, but that's because it's the highest reasonably efficient rate of climb. That's not the maximum the aircraft is capable of under power (closer to 3000 ft/min), and is absolutely no indication of that maximum unsustained climb rate.
It would eventually stall at any unsustainable rate of climb, but then again, so would any aircraft even at a sustainable rate... Keep climbing and before too long you run out of atmosphere.
Either way, there is nothing to say that climbing above the sustained climb rate for an aircraft is unsafe or, necessarily, unusual. You trade airspeed for altitude, sure, but if you need to be higher at that moment in time, there's plenty of time to accelerate again later.
The three are roughly the same at 10,000', at about 2500 fpm. (Maybe a bit more for a light A319, and less for a full A321)
Normal climb rates from 10,000' to about 30,000 are as follows:
A319, 3000 fpm to about 1500 at 30,000'
A320, 2200 fpm to about 1000 at 30,000'
A321, 1400 fpm to about 500 at 30,000'
TL;DR - The official is spouting nonsense s/he doesn't understand. A fighter is the only aircraft likely to be able to (or wish to) climb at a 6000 ft/minute SUSTAINED climb rate, but almost any aircraft can climb at that rate for brief durations in a zoom climb - converting airspeed/momentum to altitude


有时别太信官员的话啊!!!!

回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 30-1-2015 10:49 AM | 显示全部楼层
不通副机师只是帮正机师倒茶递水,其余都不用做。
回复

使用道具 举报

Follow Us
发表于 30-1-2015 11:52 AM | 显示全部楼层
副机师操控飞机,有问题吗???
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 30-1-2015 11:55 AM | 显示全部楼层
副机師是法籍. 这就是问題所在.
回复

使用道具 举报


ADVERTISEMENT

发表于 30-1-2015 02:08 PM | 显示全部楼层
人都死了,还要无赖给对方...
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 30-1-2015 02:38 PM | 显示全部楼层
lkfight 发表于 30-1-2015 02:08 PM
人都死了,还要无赖给对方...

因为只有死人才不会说话
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 30-1-2015 03:38 PM | 显示全部楼层
bingwei 发表于 30-1-2015 02:38 PM
因为只有死人才不会说话

等他上来找他算账
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 30-1-2015 06:22 PM | 显示全部楼层
Midnightfly 发表于 30-1-2015 11:52 AM
副机师操控飞机,有问题吗???

飞机撞大海, 所有人死完, 你说有问题吗?
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

 

ADVERTISEMENT



ADVERTISEMENT



ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT


版权所有 © 1996-2023 Cari Internet Sdn Bhd (483575-W)|IPSERVERONE 提供云主机|广告刊登|关于我们|私隐权|免控|投诉|联络|脸书|佳礼资讯网

GMT+8, 11-11-2024 06:20 AM , Processed in 0.123074 second(s), 28 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表