|
|
非民选而国者，天下共驱之；非人权而霸者，天下共击之——浅谈未来世界趋势
[复制链接]
|
|
|
发表于 29-4-2021 08:13 PM
|
显示全部楼层
你自己先反省自己的口是心非吧....其他的都是廢話.
證據啊....證據......你口是心非的證據!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 29-4-2021 08:15 PM
|
显示全部楼层
简单来说，是大部分实权，然后留下一点点虚权让元首有些尊严。
最后的，就是君主立宪制，证明了是虚位元首，打脸你啦！
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 29-4-2021 08:16 PM
|
显示全部楼层
错错错！
本来是我和oyak的讨论，是我们在说东，你半路进来说西。
所以我说东，你才是西，懂不懂？
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 29-4-2021 08:17 PM
|
显示全部楼层
那么如果美国没有女人胜选总统，就等于女人不可以做总统吗？
沒人選和沒有錢去選是兩回事!
大家來看不要臉的岳不群tuaceng....
明確讓大家看到它如何常常運用偷換概念
的手法來作弊!!!
這就證明, 我稱它為岳不群是實至名歸!!!!
打臉後再打臉.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 29-4-2021 08:18 PM
|
显示全部楼层
马国现实上没有华人担任过首相，所以法律不阻止华人參選, 但現實你根本作不到.....
不就很容易再打你臉....笑死人了!!!!
去看醫生吧, 臉要看, 精神科也去看 ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 29-4-2021 08:19 PM
|
显示全部楼层
证明了本人是良好市民一个阿！
相反的你：
被扣分，禁言，封号的，属于罪名成立的！
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 29-4-2021 08:19 PM
|
显示全部楼层
在國會懸峙時, 他就很有實權了.....這是事實,
你再拗有甚麼用.
Oyak的例子, 就是說明這個時機.....他沒錯, 反而是你一拗再拗,
拗到不要臉, 最終被打臉....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 29-4-2021 08:25 PM
|
显示全部楼层
你才是偷换概念的！
按照你的逻辑，华人没有当过首相，所以现实上是做不到的！
这就是你拿不出法律依据后，以这个企图来为你的嘴炮开脱！
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 29-4-2021 08:28 PM
|
显示全部楼层
错错错，这个是属于虚权，而不是实权。
已经打脸你多次了。
Limits on discretion: Though the King’s discretion is broad, it is not absolute. In a rule-of-law society, no discretion can be absolute and such discretion must be exercised within the perimeters of the law and conventions. The following guidelines exist: • The King cannot rule the country on his own. Regardless of personal feelings about the elected leader or whether there is a “hung Parliament” (with no group commanding a majority), the monarch must appoint someone to lead the government. • Under Article 43(2)(a), the PM must belong to the Dewan Rakyat. • The PM must not be a citizen by naturalisation or registration (Article 43(7)). • The race, religion, region or gender of the nominee are not mandated by the law. Instead, the Constitution, in Article 8, calls for equality before the law. This is in contrast with the Constitutions of the nine Malay States, which are explicit that unless the Ruler makes an exception, the MB must be a Malay/Muslim. • The PM must, “in the judgment of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong”, be “likely to command the confidence of the majority of the members of the House”. This wording leads some commentators to believe that the Monarch has unlimited and subjective discretion in appointing the PM. Most respectfully, the absolute discretion theory is not in keeping with the scheme of a constitutional monarchy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 29-4-2021 08:31 PM
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 SuperKedah 于 29-4-2021 08:49 PM 编辑
看你, 開始髮夾彎了....剛才不是大力大力大大力堅持只有虛權麼???
然後又用不及格的數學在唬爛.....
假設, 實權 = A, 虛權 = B, A =/= B (A不等於B)
大部份實權 : 50% < A < 100%
留下一點點的虛權. ??% > B > 0% (一點點是多少不知, 用??代替)
實權部份 :
A + Z = 100%....Z 是甚麼? 我不知, 岳不群tuaceng應告訴大家,
這憲法上的權力分配, 還有一部份的實權在某個人/某個組織的手上.
A目前明顯的是三權. 就請岳不群tuaceng告訴大家, 這神祕的Z 是甚麼????
同理
虛權部份 :
B + Q = 100%...目前最高元首B只有一點點虛權,
則必還有一個個人/一個組織佔據著大量的虛權.
請岳不群tuaceng告訴大家, 這神祕的Q 是甚麼????
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 29-4-2021 08:34 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 29-4-2021 08:36 PM
|
显示全部楼层
tuaceng 发表于 29-4-2021 08:28 PM
错错错，这个是属于虚权，而不是实权。
已经打脸你多次了。
Limits on discretion: Though the King’s discretion is broad, it is not absolute. In a rule-of-law society, no discretion can be absolute an ...
不是實權哦???? 屬虛權??? 請你去騙三歲小孫子,
佳禮不適合, OK!
我只能...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 29-4-2021 08:38 PM
|
显示全部楼层
SuperKedah 发表于 29-4-2021 08:31 PM
看你, 開始髮夾彎了....剛才不是大力大力大大力堅持只有虛權麼???
然後又用不及格的數學在唬爛.....
假設, 實權 = A, 虛權 = B, A =/= B (A不等於B)
大部份實權 : 0% < A < 100%
留下一點點的虛權. ??% > ...
这个实在是搞笑啦!
大家来看superkedah的数学formula啦！
0% < A < 100%
留下一點點的虛權. ??% > B > 0% (一點點
實權部份 :
A + Z = 100%....
虛權部份 :
B + Q = 100%...目前最
不过可以肯定的是，superkedah又再老人痴呆症发作，自己都不知道自己在讲什么啦！
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 29-4-2021 08:40 PM
|
显示全部楼层
当然是做得到！
很多事情，以前没有人去做，不代表做不到！
奥巴马之前，难道黑人不可以做总统？
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 29-4-2021 08:41 PM
|
显示全部楼层
春是粗口...大家快來看, 以前你用這字, 就足以送你去朝鮮了....
你的數學是不識字的校工教的, 當然看不懂.....
語文水平差, 數學差....只有嘴炮天下無敵....
哈! 哈! 哈!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 29-4-2021 08:41 PM
|
显示全部楼层
当然是虚权！实实在在的东东，是你自己一个人才会认为是实权。請你去騙三歲小孫子,
佳禮不適合, OK!
Limits on discretion: Though the King’s discretion is broad, it is not absolute. In a rule-of-law society, no discretion can be absolute and such discretion must be exercised within the perimeters of the law and conventions. The following guidelines exist: • The King cannot rule the country on his own. Regardless of personal feelings about the elected leader or whether there is a “hung Parliament” (with no group commanding a majority), the monarch must appoint someone to lead the government. • Under Article 43(2)(a), the PM must belong to the Dewan Rakyat. • The PM must not be a citizen by naturalisation or registration (Article 43(7)). • The race, religion, region or gender of the nominee are not mandated by the law. Instead, the Constitution, in Article 8, calls for equality before the law. This is in contrast with the Constitutions of the nine Malay States, which are explicit that unless the Ruler makes an exception, the MB must be a Malay/Muslim. • The PM must, “in the judgment of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong”, be “likely to command the confidence of the majority of the members of the House”. This wording leads some commentators to believe that the Monarch has unlimited and subjective discretion in appointing the PM. Most respectfully, the absolute discretion theory is not in keeping with the scheme of a constitutional monarchy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 29-4-2021 08:43 PM
|
显示全部楼层
黑人有錢選, 當然可以...如奧觀海是沒錢打散工的流浪漢, 他能選嗎....
美國選舉, 都是億億美金...沒政黨支持, 不是億萬富豪, 有誰能選???
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 29-4-2021 08:44 PM
|
显示全部楼层
春是粗口?好极了，你现在就去举报我，如果我被扣分的话，我承认你对！
快阿！
你的數學是不識字的校工教的, 當然看不懂.....
語文水平差, 數學差....只有嘴炮天下無敵....
哈! 哈! 哈!
你的数学有如1+1=11，正常人当然看不懂，只有你一个人才会看懂这个老人痴呆数学啦！
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 29-4-2021 08:46 PM
|
显示全部楼层
华人有钱的那么多，又不见华人做首相？
所以，你说的都是老人痴呆话。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 29-4-2021 08:48 PM
|
显示全部楼层
tuaceng 发表于 29-4-2021 08:41 PM
当然是虚权！实实在在的东东，是你自己一个人才会认为是实权。請你去騙三歲小孫子,
佳禮不適合, OK!
Limits on discretion: Though the King’s discretion is broad, it is not abso ...
能挑首相叫虛權....你拗到真難看,
不會現在就開啟你無敵的硬拗死不認錯功了吧....
平常你不到最後一刻是不輕易動它的哦....
明白! 你輸了!!!!! 你心裡明白你輸了!!!!!
好了, 就這樣, 印度需要你, 回去吧.
p/s: 以下開放你的跳針機, 馬後炮機, 文抄公機.....
你認輸了, 就拜拜吧.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 本周最热论坛帖子
|
3570 
142
