WSJ 現承認捐款來自沙地阿拉伯

江夏

新聞秘書：
過去質疑首相款項
WSJ現承認沙地捐

（吉隆坡31日訊）首相拿督斯里納吉新聞秘書東姑沙立夫丁指出，
美國《華爾街日報》（The Wall Street Journal）今日首次被迫承認，
至少有一些給首相的捐款來自沙地阿拉伯。

他說，《華爾街日報》過去近一年來，一直否認該筆款項來自沙地阿拉伯，
反之還攻擊那些提出這建議的人。

“這些人包括在審核了詳盡調查報告和調查所有證據包括跟王室成員進行訪談的總檢察長，
都證實該筆捐款來自沙地阿拉伯一個王室。”

他指出，華爾街日報既不是從馬來西亞合法當局，
也不是從沙地阿拉伯外交部長或其他有聲譽的媒體如BBC和每日電訊等管道確認，
而這些資料管道足以讓華爾街日報停止他們的攻擊或否認任何來自沙地阿拉伯的基金。

暴露WSJ報道存偏見

“這暴露了該報的報道存有偏見，並明確反映出他們的報道並不是建立在公正報道事實的基礎上。
反之，他們的報告卻根據虛假訊息或甘心接受敦馬哈迪的反納吉運動所提供。”

東姑沙立夫丁指出，也許阻止他們全面接受事實會令他們感到尷尬，即如證據顯示，
也如首相向來堅持指資金是來自沙地阿拉伯的一筆捐款。
“不管怎樣，今天華爾街日報承認他們一直以來都報道錯誤，這只是一小步。
而且他們以無名或匿名消息來源作為新聞報道的基礎是錯誤的，
有關匿名者的身份從未被揭露過或甚至可能不存在。”

- See more at: http://news.sinchew.com.my/topic/node/519115?tid=1353#sthash.4yF2DHIP.dpuf





繼 外資注入44億 : 馬股牛市世界最長！破壞金融體系者再次被打臉啪啪啪
和
刷新 43 年最大漲幅 ： 馬幣首季升值9.7%！更新！3.8820！
後，反對黨支持者第三次被打臉啪啪啪。
請問反對黨支持者們還亂亂相信外國媒體嗎？
請大家回頭是岸，識破外國勢力意圖攻擊我國大馬經濟和污衊政府的陰謀，
一起站在首相納吉背後，甚至前線，抵禦外國陰謀團的攻擊！

• 
  

罗马军团

沙地王子说是投资不是捐款

江夏

罗马军团 发表于 1-4-2016 11:38 PM
沙地王子说是投资不是捐款

你相信沙地外交部長傳達 “王子” 的話是投資；
我相信已故沙地國王首肯捐助大馬打擊穆斯林兄弟會。

Ecor1

就算是捐款也是死，因为是进入纳吉私人户口，所以足够构成贪污

而且没有身有粪，何必被发现后把钱还回去给沙地？

加上除了来之沙地，还有很多其他未名的款项。。。。

只有脑残的还继续支持纳吉

江夏

Ecor1 发表于 2-4-2016 12:04 AM
就算是捐款也是死，因为是进入纳吉私人户口，所以足够构成贪污

加上还有很多其他未名的款项。。。。

只有脑残的还继续支持纳吉

總檢察長已經證明沒貪污了。

不如反對黨支持者努力攻讀法律，登上總檢察長之位，找證據提控首相吧。

江夏

Ecor1 发表于 2-4-2016 12:04 AM
就算是捐款也是死，因为是进入纳吉私人户口，所以足够构成贪污

而且没有身有粪，何必被发现后把钱还回去给沙地？

加上除了来之沙地，还有很多其他未名的款项。。。。

只有脑残的还继续支持纳吉

一定身上有屎才退錢嗎？

首相納吉身為虔誠中庸回教徒，原本打擊離異極端穆兄會已是己任，所以不要巨款也非常合理。

就如我們孝順和奉養父母是己任，祗有不肖子才要錢。

TMNUTsucks

没有贪污？我信 才怪。

TMNUTsucks

江夏 发表于 2-4-2016 12:09 AM
總檢察長已經證明沒貪污了。

不如反對黨支持者努力攻讀法律，登上總檢察長之位，找證據提控首相吧。

总检察署不代表人民。人民认为首相有没有贪污，不会受到总检察署的决定所影响。

lumixcer

曾经有只广告。。不要一点点，要多一点点。

TMNUTsucks

我们已经给首相及国阵支持者足够的机会与时间来证明首相无罪及没有贪污。但是呢，首相及国阵支持者都不珍惜这些时间及机会。那么，我们没办法。

江夏

TMNUTsucks 发表于 2-4-2016 12:23 AM
没有贪污？我信 才怪。

你的相信不重要。
事實是 WSJ 報到失誤，誤導大眾。

TMNUTsucks

江夏 发表于 2-4-2016 12:34 AM
你的相信不重要。
事實是 WSJ 報到失誤，誤導大眾。

事实是没有证据证明首相没做过。WSJ的报道是否失误跟我完全没有关系。

cyberjaye

Ecor1 发表于 2-4-2016 12:04 AM
就算是捐款也是死，因为是进入纳吉私人户口，所以足够构成贪污

而且没有身有粪，何必被发现后把钱还回去给沙地？

加上除了来之沙地，还有很多其他未名的款项。。。。

只有脑残的还继续支持纳吉

1马的SCR有4千多万掉入26亿的口袋，还有300万欧洲钻石shopping卡债是用1马的钱！

单单这两条就能起诉了

可惜副检控官被进油桶了，总检察长被政府以健康为由终止职务

真是体恤下属啊！

知道副检控官查的很累所以让他睡，知道总检察长老了力有不逮，所以把他被退休。

rometyk

不要做故事了啦，以纳吉的性格，如果wsj的错他直接就告wsj诽谤了好不好。。。不然之前一直跟律师团在那边搞三搞四做什么

johanson

Ecor1 发表于 2-4-2016 12:04 AM
就算是捐款也是死，因为是进入纳吉私人户口，所以足够构成贪污

而且没有身有粪，何必被发现后把钱还回去给沙地？

加上除了来之沙地，还有很多其他未名的款项。。。。

只有脑残的还继续支持纳吉

给你附加一点新闻，纳吉的捐款者的名字跟沙地王子的名字不符合。

那封信很有可能是伪造的，心里头写得很模凌两可。


Digging A Deeper Hole For Najib

The Australian media has confirmed Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak’s statement and the findings of Malaysian authorities that the money deposited into his personal bank accounts was a donation from a Saudi royalty, said Putrajaya.
“The investigations included forensic examination of every wire transfer,” said a government spokesperson in a statement issued by the Prime Minister’s Office today.
“Malaysian authorities also travelled to Saudi Arabia to examine documentation and interview members of the royal family, and the officials who administered the donation.
“As the leaked letter from Saudi Arabia states, the donation was a gift to the prime minister for promoting moderate Islam, and his leadership in combatting terrorism and extremism – such as by launching his Global Movement of Moderates initiative.
“The letter makes clear the gift was to be used as the prime minister saw fit; would be transferred directly or through the donor’s companies; and no benefit was expected in return,” the spokesperson added.

Comment
                                                                Now that Putrajaya has announced that the details in the Four Corners Programme about the Saudi letter purporting to be Najib’s donor are correct, they can no longer pretend to be coy about the identity behind the name.
Or rather names – because, unfortunately and most confusingly, this ‘donor’ is characterised by no less than three separate names in the documentation. According to the letter he is supposedly a Prince Saud Abdulaziz al-Saud from the Private Office of Saud Abdulaziz Majid al-Saud, but the money was sent from an account in the name of Prince Faisal bin Turkey bin Bandar Alsaud.
So, which of these three ‘Royal’ names is the correct version and to which individual in Saudi Arabia does it pertain?  Because, of course, none of these names refer to any known billionaire Prince in the Saudi royal household.
Putrajaya had better come up with an answer, because the rest of the world has started falling around holding their sides in laughter at this childish ploy and ridiculous letter to boot…. when they are not scratching their heads over how AmBank could accept such tosh, that is.

http://www.sarawakreport.org/tal ... per-hole-for-najib/

panwood

问题又来了？？？？

沙地王子以什么身份捐赠，
代表王室？
代表国家？
代表宗教？

一国之相以什么姿态去受益，
个人？
团队？
国家？

最基本的检察入门，凡夫俗子都会问，何况是高智商的检察官，

jasonmun

以逻辑上看,

都已知道什么回事.

说再多话, 也只是越描越黑.

Ecor1

johanson 发表于 2-4-2016 01:21 AM
给你附加一点新闻，纳吉的捐款者的名字跟沙地王子的名字不符合。

那封信很有可能是伪造的，心里头写得很模凌两可。


Digging A Deeper Hole For Najib
The Australian media has confirmed Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak’s statement and the findings of Malaysian authorities that the money deposited into his personal bank accounts was a donation from a Saudi royalty, said Putrajaya.
“The investigations included forensic examination of every wire transfer,” said a government spokesperson in a statement issued by the Prime Minister’s Office today.
“Malaysian authorities also travelled to Saudi Arabia to examine documentation and interview members of the royal family, and the officials who administered the donation.
“As the leaked letter from Saudi Arabia states, the donation was a gift to the prime minister for promoting moderate Islam, and his leadership in combatting terrorism and extremism – such as by launching his Global Movement of Moderates initiative.
“The letter makes clear the gift was to be used as the prime minister saw fit; would be transferred directly or through the donor’s companies; and no benefit was expected in return,” the spokesperson added.

Comment
                                                                Now that Putrajaya has announced that the details in the Four Corners Programme about the Saudi letter purporting to be Najib’s donor are correct, they can no longer pretend to be coy about the identity behind the name.
Or rather names – because, unfortunately and most confusingly, this ‘donor’ is characterised by no less than three separate names in the documentation. According to the letter he is supposedly a Prince Saud Abdulaziz al-Saud from the Private Office of Saud Abdulaziz Majid al-Saud, but the money was sent from an account in the name of Prince Faisal bin Turkey bin Bandar Alsaud.
So, which of these three ‘Royal’ names is the correct version and to which individual in Saudi Arabia does it pertain?  Because, of course, none of these names refer to any known bil ...

这些记者真的很重要

Ecor1

cyberjaye 发表于 2-4-2016 01:11 AM
1马的SCR有4千多万掉入26亿的口袋，还有300万欧洲钻石shopping卡债是用1马的钱！

单单这两条就能起诉了

可惜副检控官被进油桶了，总检察长被政府以健康为由终止职务

真是体恤下属啊！

知道副检控官查的很累所以让他睡，知道总检察长老了力有不逮，所以把他被退休。

制度败坏，执法单位不能发挥作用，结果就被国阵的人拿来当作挡箭牌，骗愚民

kimkim5

楼主抛砖引玉倒自己鸡老板的米，加油！