A PROFOUNDAND OUTSTANDING THESIS ON CHEN MING YUAN THAT WE STUMBLEDUPON.WE NEVER HEARD OFTHE WRITER BEFORE BUT WE WERE TOLD HE WAS A FORMER EDITOR-IN-CHIEF OF A TAIWAN NEWSPAPERAND THE PERSON WHO WROTE THE PREFACE FORTHE FIRST INTERNATIONAL ZISHAHU AUCTION BY THE WORLD RENOWNED SOTHEBYS IN 1997.
HAVE YOU ALLHEARD OF TSAI KER SIN?
HE HASWRITTEN SOMETHING CRITICAL IN THE DISCOURSE OF CHEN MING YUAN WHICH HAS DRAWNSCHOLARSHIP TO THE SUBJECT.
BUT BYACCIDENT,REN FU COLLECTIONS STUMBLED UPON HIS CHEN MING YUAN THESIS(WRITTEN 10YEARS AGO) AND SO WE CONTACTED HIM TO INFORM HIM WE HAVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROOFSTO VERIFY HIS BOLD AND ROBUSTLY RESEARCHED STATEMENT.
IN OUREXPERIENCE,OUR FIVE(5) CHEN MING YUANZISHAHUS FROM THE FIRST 400 EARLY QING COLLECTION PROVED CHEN MING YUAN MADEMOSTLY A FEW SHAPES OF ZISHAHU AND THEYWERE GUANG HUO.SO THOSE BIG MAJESTIC PIECES (SOME MODELLED ON ARCHAIC CHINESEBRONZES ) ARE FAKES SITTING IN FAMOUS COLLECTIONS AND EVEN MUSEUMS.(RIDICULOUSISN’T IT? HOW CAN MUSEUMS FALL PREY TO FAKES?)
NOW THIS ISTHE BOMB OF TRUTH: ABOVE-MENTIONED ARE THREE PROOFS,COURTESY OF REN FUCOLLECTIONS ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXCAVATIONS,TO SUBSTANTIATE WRITER TSAI KER SIN ‘SCLAIM.
ONLY GREATTHINKER CAN PRODUCE SUCH GAME-CHANGER OFZISHAHU NARRATIVE.
ON BEHALF OFREN FU COLLECTIONS, AND TO THE BENEFIT OF THE UNCORRUPTED, TRUE LEARNINGPUBLIC,WE CONGRATULATE MR.TSAI KER SIN.
THE ZISHAHUWORLD OWES HIM TRUE GRATITUDE FOR DISPELLING UNTRUTHS AND EXPOSING FAKES WHICH MIGHT OTHERWISEDOOMED OR DAMAGED CHEN MING YUAN'S LEG’CYFOREVER.
THE BATTLEFOR TRUTH BEGINS.
PEOPLE ARENOT STUPID AND GULLIBLE ANYMORE.
偶然機會，我们聽到一位法國巴黎《欧洲日报》总编辑蔡格森的名字，1997年苏富比拍卖公司世界首次紫砂壶專拍的目錄，即是由他撰寫前言。你们有听过蔡格森先生吗？他另一篇探讨鸣远壶的论文，也深受壶友关注。
我们聯絡上蔡先生，也找到蔡先生的陈鸣远的论文（10年前编写），發現他的論點，符合我们的考古验证。
根据我们的经验，从清早期紫砂壶证明陈鸣远的造型，是最传统的素面光货。那些大的美妙乐章（有的仿照古代青铜器造型）都非常可疑，其中有些甚至是博馆藏品。
现在，这是真理的炸弹：上述兩种例証，是任富收藏的考古發掘，可支持蔡格森先生的说法。
发表于 15-11-2014 04:51 PM
变色卡
千斤顶
楼主
.gif)
本周最热论坛帖子
3962 
65
