DESPITE SIXTY YEARS OF EFFECTIVE TREATMENT On one hand, the authorities continue to have us believe that cancer is an illness that is
just as mysterious as it is deadly. And that we must combat it with violence. On the other hand,
we know that effective treatments do exist. These treatments have existed for sixty years.
Could it be that those close to us might still be alive today?
IN 1934, IN THE UNITED STATES
Royal Rife and a group of doctors, under the auspices of the
University of Southern California, revealed their clinical successes.
They had succeeded in destroying the micro-organism responsible for
cancer by means of a precise electro-magnetic wavelength. In the
years that would follow, the technique of treating cancer using
electro-magnetic waves would spread. And many doctors would use
it successfully. But not for long. When Morris Fishbein, director of the American Medical Association (AMA), heard talk
of this cancer treatment, he demanded that he be given a part of the action. He was refused.
The result of this refusal was not long in coming. Doctors were forced to abandon the new
technique. All articles on the treatment in medical journals were forbidden by the AMA. Results
of this technique obtained by government laboratories were lost. Researchers who supported
the treatment, as well as the principles upon which it was based, fell into disgrace and were
treated as cheats and liars. The author of the article explaining the technique, published by
the Smithsonian Institute, died while he was driving his car. ..
IN THE 1950S, IN FRANCE
Gaston Naessens, biologist, developed a series of effective anti-
cancer products. First GN-24 and then Anablast enjoyed an enormous
success, which alerted the authorities. The latter instituted legal
procedures. He had to stop treating his patients despite the extra-
ordinary results. In 1964, he immigrated to Canada. There, he developed
a new remedy against cancer, 714-X. Again a new success. And a new
headline-making trial in 1989. Patients flocked from around the world,
all bearing witness to the success of his treatment. The authorities could not condemn him. WHO SUPPRESS THESE TREATMENTS?
Who then was responsible for such a decision? Already, at this time, medicine was for
the most part in the hands of financiers. The principal actors defended prime interests.
- The all-powerful American Medical Association, which issued "seals
of approval" on products and medications, in return for
remuneration.
- The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, established in 1902.
By 1928, it had already received $65,000,000 in funds from John D. Rockefeller.
- The "king" of microbiology, at this time, was Thomas Rivers, a doctor at the Rockefeller
Institute, who in 1926 decreed that viruses and bacteria were two distinct things.
He was later director of the Rockefeller Hospital from 1937 to 1955 and vice-
president of the Rockefeller Institute from 1953 until his death. His influence
on cancer research was significant.
-The Sloan-Kettering Memorial Cancer Center in New York was the first cancer hospital in
the United States. It was the medication test centre for large pharmaceutical companies
between 1940 and 1955. Interestingly enough, Cornelius Rhoads, after several years
at the Rockefeller Institute, was named director of the Center in 1939. He remained
there up until his death in 1959. He was the biggest defender of chemotherapy
in the country.
- The American Cancer Society, founded in 1913 by John D. Rockefeller Jr. and his
associates, received tons of public money and used it to finance research projects
approved by the authorities. Those positions with any decisional powers were held
by financial interests. Whatever the country, the players in the medical system, and their tactics, are the same,
to suppress treatments that are effective against cancer. The world financiers and their
multinationals are stateless. They have no allegiance to any country. And they exploit all. It is
they who control the Medical Mafia in every country. Donna Governmenta and her children see
to it, on their behalf, that we continue to buy and consume those products which guarantee
their profits.
[ 本帖最后由 darksider 于 31-1-2009 11:25 AM 编辑 ] |