佳礼资讯网

 找回密码
 注册

ADVERTISEMENT

楼主: 漂亮妹妹

肺癌。。。。。。

[复制链接]
发表于 23-1-2009 09:39 PM | 显示全部楼层
我公公肺癌了1年多就去世了..
回复

使用道具 举报


ADVERTISEMENT

发表于 30-1-2009 04:13 PM | 显示全部楼层
原帖由 BENKOCW 于 23-1-2009 09:39 PM 发表
我公公肺癌了1年多就去世了..



是晚期?经过什么治疗?
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 31-1-2009 10:54 AM | 显示全部楼层
我建议楼主去找alternative medicine,别去电疗是最好。
alternative medicine-herbalism,nutritional medicine,homeopathy。

allopathy是最不可靠的,你去那边代表失去健康+金钱。
当然,信不信由你。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 31-1-2009 11:12 AM | 显示全部楼层
Quoted from 'Medical Mafia' by Ghislaine Lanctot.

“A Sad Statement of Account After 40 Years"

After decades of an intensive war against cancer, the situation is the following in industrialized countries:

1. The mortality rate from cancer has increased. More and more people are dying from cancer. Tangible proof that its prevention and treatment are not succeeding.

2. Billions upon billions of dollars have been spent to no avail. "Cancer costs Americans over $ 100 billion dollars each year. .. for treatments that are both ineffective and inhumane", reports Frank Wiewel, director of People Against Cancer.

3. The number of deaths continues to grow. Some 500,000 (half a million) Americans die of cancer every year.

4. Millions of people have been tortured. Maiming is commonplace. Nobody escapes it. Patients have to choose between one or more forms of mutilation:

amputation = surgery
burning = radiotherapy
poisoning = chemotherapy

All these treatments are extremely aggressive. They destabilize the body's organic balance. And seriously damage the immune system.

5. The existence of alternative remedies is either hidden from the public or access to them is forbidden. Remedies that are effective, safe and inexpensive. Those who promote them are hunted down. It is the same as the witch-hunts of the middle Ages.

6. The rights to freedom of medical choice are undermined. Our rights to decide for ourselves and to determine what we will, or will not, do with our own bodies, have been taken from us.

7. Our immune system has systematically been destroyed by the presence of many carcinogenic products, such as pesticides, vaccines, radiations, medications in the water, air, foodstuffs, and elsewhere in the environment.

[ 本帖最后由 darksider 于 31-1-2009 11:29 AM 编辑 ]
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 31-1-2009 11:20 AM | 显示全部楼层
DESPITE SIXTY YEARS OF EFFECTIVE TREATMENT
On  one  hand,  the authorities continue  to  have  us  believe  that cancer  is  an  illness  that  is
just as mysterious as  it is  deadly. And  that we must combat  it with violence. On  the other hand,
we  know  that effective  treatments do exist. These  treatments have existed  for sixty years.
Could  it be  that those close  to us might still be  alive  today?

IN  1934,  IN THE  UNITED  STATES
Royal  Rife and a group of doctors, under the auspices of the
University of Southern California,  revealed  their clinical  successes.
They  had  succeeded  in  destroying  the micro-organism  responsible  for
cancer by means of a precise electro-magnetic wavelength.  In  the
years  that would  follow,  the  technique of treating  cancer using
electro-magnetic waves would spread. And many doctors would  use
it successfully. But not for  long.
When Morris Fishbein, director of the American Medical Association  (AMA),  heard  talk
of this cancer  treatment, he  demanded  that he be  given  a part of the action. He was  refused.
The  result of this  refusal was not  long  in  coming. Doctors were  forced  to abandon  the new
technique. All  articles on  the  treatment  in medical  journals were  forbidden  by  the AMA. Results
of this  technique obtained by  government  laboratories were  lost. Researchers who  supported
the  treatment, as well as  the principles upon which  it was based,  fell  into disgrace and were
treated  as  cheats  and  liars. The  author of the article explaining  the  technique,  published by
the Smithsonian  Institute, died while he was  driving his  car.  ..

IN THE  1950S,  IN  FRANCE
Gaston  Naessens, biologist, developed a series  of effective anti-
cancer products. First GN-24 and  then Anablast enjoyed  an  enormous
success, which  alerted  the authorities. The  latter  instituted  legal
procedures. He  had  to  stop  treating his patients despite  the extra-
ordinary  results.  In  1964, he  immigrated  to Canada. There,  he  developed
a new  remedy against cancer,  714-X. Again  a new success. And  a new
headline-making  trial  in  1989. Patients  flocked  from  around  the world,
all  bearing witness  to  the  success  of his  treatment. The  authorities could not condemn  him.
WHO SUPPRESS THESE TREATMENTS?
Who  then was  responsible  for such  a decision? Already,  at this  time, medicine was  for
the most part  in  the hands of financiers. The  principal actors  defended prime  interests.
- The  all-powerful American Medical Association, which  issued  "seals
of approval"  on  products and medications,  in  return  for
remuneration.
- The  Rockefeller  Institute for Medical Research,  established  in  1902.
By  1928,  it had already  received  $65,000,000  in  funds  from  John  D.  Rockefeller.
- The  "king" of microbiology, at this  time, was Thomas Rivers,  a doctor at  the Rockefeller
Institute, who  in  1926 decreed  that viruses and bacteria were  two distinct things.
He was  later director of the Rockefeller Hospital  from  1937 to  1955 and  vice-
president of the Rockefeller  Institute from  1953 until his  death. His  influence
on  cancer  research was  significant.
-The  Sloan-Kettering Memorial Cancer Center  in New York was  the  first cancer hospital  in
the United States.  It was  the medication  test centre  for  large pharmaceutical companies
between  1940 and 1955.  Interestingly enough, Cornelius Rhoads,  after several  years
at the Rockefeller  Institute, was  named director of the Center  in  1939. He  remained
there up  until his death  in  1959. He was  the biggest defender of chemotherapy
in  the  country.
- The American Cancer Society,  founded  in  1913 by John  D.  Rockefeller Jr.  and  his
associates,  received  tons of public money and  used  it to  finance  research  projects
approved by  the authorities. Those  positions with any decisional  powers were held
by  financial  interests.
Whatever  the  country,  the players  in  the medical system, and  their tactics, are  the same,
to suppress  treatments  that are effective against cancer. The world  financiers and  their
multinationals are  stateless. They  have no allegiance  to any country. And  they exploit all.  It is
they who control  the Medical Mafia  in  every country. Donna Governmenta and her children see
to  it, on  their behalf,  that we  continue  to buy and  consume  those products which guarantee
their profits.


[ 本帖最后由 darksider 于 31-1-2009 11:25 AM 编辑 ]
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 31-1-2009 11:45 AM | 显示全部楼层








回复

使用道具 举报

Follow Us
发表于 31-1-2009 11:49 AM | 显示全部楼层







虽然照片不是很清楚,我希望楼主你好好读一篇,信不信是看个人的意思。

祝早日恢复健康!
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 31-1-2009 12:59 PM | 显示全部楼层
从网站看到的这个韩医师(美国华侨),不懂有大马人用过她的中药吗?

http://www.xianqiao.net:8080/gb/8/6/20/n2161573.htm
http://tw.epochtimes.com/b5/9/1/16/n2398899.htm
http://www.epochtimes.com/gb/9/1/30/n2412431.htm
回复

使用道具 举报


ADVERTISEMENT

发表于 31-1-2009 11:39 PM | 显示全部楼层
http://health.people.com.cn/GB/14740/21471/8412668.html

肺癌危险自测 看看你有多危险

 1、直系亲属(父母、兄弟姐妹、叔伯姑姨)中有无患肺癌者:(    )

  有:1分        无:0分

  2、现在年龄:(    )

  20—39岁:1分

  40—49岁:2分

  超过50岁:3分

  3、现在是否吸烟:(    )

  是:4分        否:0分

  4、现在不吸烟,过去是否有吸烟:(    )

  是:4分        否:0分

  5、如果现在吸烟,每天多少:(    )

  少于1包:1分

  1包左右:2分

  1包—1包半:3分

  至少2包:4分

  6、如果已经戒烟,戒了多久:(    )

  少于5年:-1分

  6—10年:-2分

  11—20年:-3分

  多于20年:-4分

  7、是否和吸烟者住在一起:(    )

  是:3分        否:0分

  8、是否在多吸烟者地方工作:(    )

  是:3分        否:0分

  9、是否患有慢性气管炎或肺气肿:(    )

  是:2分        否:0分

  10、第3题答“是”,再加5分


  得分解释:

  少于7分:危险程度较低,常规体检即可。

  7分—12分:低到中度危险,体检时建议加做胸部正、侧位片。

  13分—18分:中到高度危险,体检时建议加做胸部正、侧位片。

  高于18分:高度危险,体检时建议加做胸部低剂量螺旋CT
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 1-2-2009 12:55 PM | 显示全部楼层
与肺癌病因密切相关的五大因素


  肺癌的确切病因至今尚欠了解。经过多年的大量调查研究,目前公认下列因素与肺癌的病因有密切关系。

  (一)吸烟 根据各国的大量调查资料都说明肺癌的病因与吸纸烟关系极为密切。肺癌发病率的增长与纸烟销售量增多呈平行关系。纸烟中含有苯并芘等多种致癌物质。实验动物吸入纸烟烟雾或涂抹焦油可诱发呼吸道和皮肤癌肿。有吸烟习惯者肺癌发病率比不吸烟者高10倍,吸烟量大者发病率更高,比不吸烟者高20倍。本世纪末,西欧国家随着妇女吸烟者日益增多,女性病人肺癌的发病率也明显升高。临床确诊的肺癌病例中,每日吸纸烟20支以上,历时30年以上者,约占80%以上。近20~30年,我国吸烟的情况非常严重,近3亿人口有吸烟习惯。京、津、沪等大城市男性成年人吸烟率近50%,女性近5%,青少年中吸烟者亦为数不少,如不采取必要措施,控制、劝阻吸烟,则今后10~30年我国肺癌发病率必将进一步增长。长期吸烟可引致支气管粘膜上皮细胞增生,磷状上皮生,诱发鳞状上皮癌或未分化小细胞癌。无吸烟嗜好者,虽然也可患肺癌,但腺癌较为常见。

  (二)大气污染 工业发达国家肺癌的发病率高,城市比农村高,厂矿区比居住区高,主要原因是由于工业和交通发达地区,石油,煤和内燃机等燃烧后和沥青公路尘埃产生的含有苯并芘致癌烃等有害物质污染大气有关。调查材料说明大气中苯并芘浓度高的地区,肺癌的发病率也增高。大气污染与吸纸烟对肺癌的发病率可能互相促进,起协同作用。

  (三)职业因素 本世纪30年代文献上就有欧洲Schneeberg矿区肺癌发病率高的报道。经过多年的调查研究,目前已公认长期接触铀、镭等放射性物质及其衍化物、致癌性碳氢化合物、砷、铬、镍、铜、锡、铁、煤焦油、沥青、石油、石棉、芥子气等物质,均可诱发肺癌,主要是鳞癌和未分化小细胞癌。

  (四)肺部慢性疾病 如肺结核、矽肺、尘肺等可与肺癌并存。这些病例癌肿的发病率高于正常人。此外肺支气管慢性炎症以及肺纤维疤痕病变,在愈合过程中可能引起鳞状上皮化生或增生,在此基础上,部分病例可发展成为癌肿。

  (五)人体内在因素 如家族遗传,以及免疫机能降低,代谢活动、内分泌功能失调等也可能对肺癌的发病起一定的促进作用。
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

 

所属分类: 医疗保健


ADVERTISEMENT



ADVERTISEMENT



ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT


版权所有 © 1996-2023 Cari Internet Sdn Bhd (483575-W)|IPSERVERONE 提供云主机|广告刊登|关于我们|私隐权|免控|投诉|联络|脸书|佳礼资讯网

GMT+8, 7-4-2025 11:19 PM , Processed in 0.093478 second(s), 18 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表