|
|
【Samsung Galaxy Note GT-N7000】盖世妞讨论与分享专区 v4 ~ICS明天會來嗎?~
[复制链接]
|
|
|
发表于 11-2-2012 10:38 AM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 11-2-2012 10:44 AM
|
显示全部楼层
回复 paladin_yeow
我每刷一次新rom新kernel都wipe一次电池再calibrate的~换回3.6没有这个问题{: ...
rain886 发表于 11-2-2012 10:34 AM 
嗯...可是如果刷了过后发现battery掉很快的话, 再wipe过一次battery有时就解决问题了...我之前刷几次也是遇到这样的情况, 再wipe过battery后问题就解决了... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 11-2-2012 11:05 AM
|
显示全部楼层
回复 1133# paladin_yeow
你是说wipe多一次? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 11-2-2012 11:17 AM
|
显示全部楼层
回复 paladin_yeow
你是说wipe多一次?
rain886 发表于 11-2-2012 11:05 AM 
对, 刷了过后待机时如果电池跌很快的话. 再wipe多一次battery看看.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

楼主 |
发表于 11-2-2012 11:18 AM
|
显示全部楼层
对, 刷了过后待机时如果电池跌很快的话. 再wipe多一次battery看看....
paladin_yeow 发表于 11-2-2012 11:17 AM 
其實正確的步驟根本就是刷了新rom之後才wipe battery的,刷之前wipe無補於事 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 11-2-2012 11:57 AM
|
显示全部楼层
其實正確的步驟根本就是刷了新rom之後才wipe battery的,刷之前wipe無補於事
暗天 发表于 11-2-2012 11:18 AM 
原来是步骤的问题....原来原来..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

楼主 |
发表于 11-2-2012 12:44 PM
|
显示全部楼层
It is weird.
With 3.7 after I power off the screen it looks like doesn't go inmediately to deep sleep and it starts to drain battery like :
70mA for 30 min
50mA for 30 min
40mA for 30 min
30mA for 30 min
and finally goes down to 21mA until I use it again.
With 3.5 inmediately after I power off the screen the device goes down to 20mA. I tried to flash kernel 2 times and with several phone charges. Any idea of why this?
難怪,我就奇怪怎麼待機反而比以前耗電 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 11-2-2012 01:33 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
为什么我的note开机的时候会出现AbyssNotekerne的图片的 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 11-2-2012 01:37 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 11-2-2012 02:10 PM
|
显示全部楼层
为什么我的note开机的时候会出现AbyssNotekerne的图片的
jefft 发表于 11-2-2012 01:33 PM 
你用着custom logo 版。
下载original logo 版。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 11-2-2012 02:11 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 11-2-2012 02:15 PM
|
显示全部楼层
你用着custom logo 版。
下载original logo 版。
keatlck 发表于 11-2-2012 02:10 PM 
好的~谢谢 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 11-2-2012 02:32 PM
|
显示全部楼层
回复 1130# paladin_yeow
原来电池也可以~~谢谢提点~~
我之前root ROCKET v20 卡在开始画面~~
之后,我去做wipe data / fac...就可以了。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 11-2-2012 02:43 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 11-2-2012 03:33 PM
|
显示全部楼层
boonteong12345 发表于 11-2-2012 02:11 PM 
Abyss kernel 3.6?? 你的display 怎么调到那么低?? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 11-2-2012 04:14 PM
|
显示全部楼层
Abyss kernel 3.6?? 你的display 怎么调到那么低??
alonedreamz 发表于 11-2-2012 03:33 PM 
是的…
因为没动它整天,玩不到5分钟…但是fb notification 照走 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 11-2-2012 05:23 PM
|
显示全部楼层
是的…
因为没动它整天,玩不到5分钟…但是fb notification 照走
boonteong12345 发表于 11-2-2012 04:14 PM 
3.6 好过3.7? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 11-2-2012 05:50 PM
|
显示全部楼层
3.6 好过3.7?
raitospk 发表于 11-2-2012 05:23 PM 
从各位大大的回应而言,确实如此 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 11-2-2012 06:52 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 11-2-2012 06:59 PM
|
显示全部楼层
Note: Benchmarks dont mean much of anything... but for those that were curious...
Kernal: Abyss Kernel 3.7
ROM: Rocket Rom v22
Clock: 1.66ghz (OVERCLOCKED)
Governor: Performance for benchmarking, lulzactive/on demand otherwise
Other Notes: things were smooth and battery was ok.. .
(on performance)
Quadrant: ~4900-5000
Passmark: 2,200
Kernal: Franco Kernal #1
ROM: Rocket ROM v22
Clock: 1.4ghz (NO Overclock)
Governor: On Demand
Quadrant: 5120
Passmark: 2400
Conclusion/Notes so far: Still need to test for a couple days but here are my initial impressions.
-Benchmarks: Franco kernal "won" at stock clock speed (@1.4 ghz, on damand)!, when compared to Abyss Kernel Overclocked (@1.66ghz, performance).
-Battery: I will need more time to evaluate this but in theory Franco's kernel should have better battery life due to it not being overclocked. As for Abyss, its battery life was good considering the overclocked and the slightly compromise in battery life (but was still pretty good).
-Real World/Performance/Experience: Abyss Kernel (overclocked) like most overclocked kernel's I've seen, it performs very well and tend to snap/load things faster (obviously). BUT, it seems that Franco Kernel tends to be overall much smoother and seems to not hang/stutter like many overclock kernels tend to do every now and then. Franco's may not load an app the fastest(by .2-.3 seconds, nothing huge) but seems to provide superb fluid transition, responsive and so far hasn't stuttered a bit. Basically the overall experience seems to be much better.
obviously more time is need to get a true sampling/evaluation... but for those that were curious. I definitely recommend, and already seems to be the best kernel (for me anyway) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
本周最热论坛帖子
|