下个月15间caltex关门大吉

SilLyPanDa

zaqre 发表于 21-6-2017 08:41 AM
“這回輪到美國CALTEX！”
上回是哪一個？

上一回是shell,不过他们是退出炼油业。零售业现在不知道有没有别人接管，还是shell自己营业

科学就是未来

关闭最重要原因是Caltex 跟油站业者断约：

https://www.beritadaily.com/petrol-station-dealers-cry-foul-over-termination/

KUALA LUMPUR: Thirteen Caltex petrol station dealers are in dire straits after they were forced to vacant their premises by the petroleum company without proper notice.
Speaking to Berita Daily, one of the dealers, Fauziah Ahmad Fadzil said that Caltex had decided to terminate the service of the 13 dealers after they had been involved in a legal suit against the company some three years ago.
“It all started when the 13 of us decided not to heed with the instruction from Caltex. They wanted us to pay for the upgrade of the pump for automated machine.
“The charge was about RM1,500 to RM2,000 a month. However, there was a clear-cut instruction from the government that dealers are not responsible for the upgrade. The company should bear the cost of the installation.
“We took the matter to court and we won twice at the High Court and the Court of Appeal. But Caltex was not satisfied and took the matter to the Federal Court and there we lost our case,” he said.
He added that after the Federal Court decision, the 13 dealers paid about RM300,000 to Caltex thinking that that was the end of the matter.
Fauziah said Caltex however had ordered the 13 of them to leave the premises as their contract had been terminated.
According to Fauziah, all 13 petrol station dealers were given only 30 days to vacate their stations without stating a proper reason.
“This is a kind of systematic bullying by the company. Why terminate the 13 of us.
“It is to set an example to other dealers that they must not go against the company. We were not simply challenging them. We are fighting for our rights. The order from the government was clear.
“Dealers are not the one who should bear the cost of the installation. But even after they won, they are not happy with us. We are not new in this industry. Among us, some have 49 years of experience,” said Fauziah who had been managing two petrol stations for almost 17 years.
She said they wanted the the government, especially the Domestic Trade, Cooperatives and Consumerism Ministry (KPDNKK), to look into this matter seriously.
“The ministry should not allow local dealers to be bullied by a foreign company and let them do whatever they want to us,” she added.
Asked on her next move, Fauziah said that they will be seeking for some assistance from KPDNKK to reach for an amicable settlement between both parties.
However, she said if Caltex refused to look for a better resolution, her group would not hesitate to take the matter to court once again.
“We are reaching out the ministry, the Muslim Consumers Association of Malaysia (PPIM) and local petroleum dealer associations,” she said.
新闻简要是讲13位油站业者大约三年前曾经跟caltex 有过官司，是Caltex 要升级油站机器但是要油站业者给钱升级，而油站业者讲政府规则有讲油站业者没有责任去升级油站的机器，最后13位油站业者和caltex 打官司，在最高法庭和上诉庭都是13位油站业者胜出，最后在联邦法院才判caltex 胜利，最后13位油站业者付出大约 RM 300k 给caltex ( 没有列出RM 300k 是不是全部都是机器升级费用，还是包括庭费）。
13位油站业者以为事情已经结束，但是最后忽然caltex 出信通知断约，然后30天内需要清场搬离他们的油站 （这点看出，可能这13间油站拥有权是在caltex 而不是13位油站业者？）
其中一位油站业者讲他们不是故意要挑战caltex，他们是在保护自己的权益。他们也感觉这是欺压。

以上是该新闻写出的那些油站被断约的故事。至于事实是否如此，外人不知道，毕竟是3年前的官司纠纷，真的跟现在断约有关系？

科学就是未来

http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com ... urt-over-a-dispute/

新闻中提到，Chevron Malaysia Ltd 只断6家合约，而非15家。

而且他们也不会见这些油站业主，讨论断约事情

picasso

科学就是未来 发表于 25-6-2017 11:52 PM
http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2017/06/24/caltex-retailers-took-us-to-court-over-a-dispute/

新闻中提到，Chevron Malaysia Ltd 只断6家合约，而非15家。

而且他们也不会见这些油站业 ...

8年法律诉讼，从 high court 到 federal court, 我在想与其花这些律师费与时间不如直接付钱安装 machine 更好，还能维持良好关系。奇怪为什么其他油站又会付钱做，但就他们几个就不要。。。

法庭永远都是不能完美解决问题的地方，总有手尾还有“后继”行动。协调，庭外解决更好。

科学就是未来

picasso 发表于 27-6-2017 12:40 PM
8年法律诉讼，从 high court 到 federal court, 我在想与其花这些律师费与时间不如直接付钱安装 machine 更好，还能维持良好关系。奇怪为什么其他油站又会付钱做，但就他们几个就不要。。。

法庭永远都是不能完 ...

每个人有自己想法，油站业者也为了自己利益去争取。虽然最后官司还是油公司赢了。

但是真正被断约的原因没人懂，只有油公司里面涉及人士懂而已。油站业主也是猜测是跟官司纠纷有关

加峻

我工作地点方便打油的。只有caltex。

ragion

消息是真的？