|
|
发表于 9-4-2008 05:10 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
看 来 以 后 LAW 有 什 么 问 题, 都 可 以 请 教 这 里 的 前 辈 们 了.... 现 在A-LEVEL 的CONTRACT LAW 真 令 我 头 痛,5 月 多 就 考 试 了.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 9-4-2008 05:14 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 9-4-2008 05:56 PM
|
显示全部楼层
看 来 草 莓 她 很 有 潜 能 当RESEARCHER....
起 人 底...  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 9-4-2008 05:58 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 9-4-2008 05:59 PM
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 jhong 于 9-4-2008 05:10 PM 发表 
看 来 以 后 LAW 有 什 么 问 题, 都 可 以 请 教 这 里 的 前 辈 们 了.... 现 在A-LEVEL 的CONTRACT LAW 真 令 我 头 痛,5 月 多 就 考 试 了....
我也是要考 contract 了  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 9-4-2008 06:19 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 9-4-2008 06:22 PM
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 Jeanne 于 9-4-2008 05:59 PM 发表 
我也是要考 contract 了
你 的CONTRACT 是 比 较ADVANCE 的 吧.... 我 的 只 是A-LEVEL 的LAW....
虽 然 如 此, 还 是 头 痛 的 一 科...
TORT 还 可 以... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 9-4-2008 07:08 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 9-4-2008 07:09 PM
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 Jeanne 于 9-4-2008 05:58 PM 发表
哪里会糟糕,你是我们的好 senior
一点都不好的说。。。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 9-4-2008 07:18 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 9-4-2008 07:26 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

楼主 |
发表于 9-4-2008 07:52 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 9-4-2008 08:14 PM
|
显示全部楼层
还是没有人回我的问题哦
um's llb被哪里一所英国大学所承认? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 9-4-2008 08:19 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 9-4-2008 08:45 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

楼主 |
发表于 9-4-2008 09:44 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 9-4-2008 09:45 PM
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 草莓 于 9-4-2008 08:14 PM 发表 
还是没有人回我的问题哦
um's llb被哪里一所英国大学所承认?
应该都会被承认啊,我们很多教授都是 UM LLB 毕业后出国深造的。
Singapore, UK, Australia, Harvard 都有  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

楼主 |
发表于 9-4-2008 09:46 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 10-4-2008 12:03 AM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 10-4-2008 04:39 AM
|
显示全部楼层
以 下 是MOOTING COMPETITION 的 题 目,
不 晓 得 个 各 位SENIOR 有 何 高 见???
如 果 没 错, 将 在 四 月 三 十 日 比 赛, 在TAYLOR UC...
In the Court of Appeal
The Laker Polytechnic, and Redbanks and Sons v Forsyte
The Laker Polytechnic contracted out the building of a new hall of residence to Redbanks and Sons, contractors, in June 2006. The intended site for the hall was part of the existing main Polytechnic campus, and work commenced there in November 2006. The contractors surrounded the building site with a three strand wire fence and erected notices at intervals round the fence stating “DANGER, NO UNAUTHORISED ENTRY.” In addition the Polytechnic authorities placed a notice at the main entrance to the Polytechnic stating that the Polytechnic would accept no liability for accidents to entrants on to the Polytechnic premises, “howsoever caused.”
John Forsyte, a humanities student, attended a disco in the students’ union in February 2007, and on his way home decided to take a short cut across the building site. He climbed over the wire fence and shortly afterwards fell down a shaft that the contractors had dug for the foundations of the new building. John Forsyte was seriously injured in this accident and brought an action founded on Occupiers’ Liability against both the Polytechnic authorities and the contractors, Redbanks and Sons, claiming damages.
In the High Court, Murphy J. assessed Forsyte’s damages at £50, 000 but reduced them to £25,000 on account of Forsyte’s contributory negligence which he assessed at 50 per cent. His Lordship held that the defendants were liable for breach of duty in section 1 of the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1984 and awarded damages of £25, 000 against the defendants, holding that they were liable as joint controlling occupiers, to the extent of 50 per cent. each.
The Polytechnic and the contractors now appeal against the award of damages on the following grounds.
(1) The notice at the entrance to the main Polytechnic campus was effective in excluding the liability for Forsyte’s injury.
(2) In ignoring the notices posted around the building site by the contractors warning him of the danger and in subsequently entering the site, Forsyte had consented to the risk of being injured on the site.
应 该 不 会 扣 分 吧, 我 总 不 能 把 它 一 整 篇 翻 译 去 华 文 吧??
如 果 可 以, 版 主, 请 允 许 用 英 文 回 帖 吧....  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
本周最热论坛帖子
|