不懂的是你！看好对于这个宪法的分析！从这里，已经非常明确的阻止君主直接的实权统治国家了。
所以回到oyak的问题，马国君主，绝对是虚权！
Under Article 43(2)(a), the PM must be an MP who in the judgment of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, is “likely to command the confidence of the majority of the members of the (lower) House”. In selecting the PM, the King is not required to take the percentage of electoral votes into consideration. It is the percentage of seats that matters. Limits on discretion: Though the King’s discretion is broad, it is not absolute. In a rule-of-law society, no discretion can be absolute and such discretion must be exercised within the perimeters of the law and conventions. The following guidelines exist: • The King cannot rule the country on his own. Regardless of personal feelings about the elected leader or whether there is a “hung Parliament” (with no group commanding a majority), the monarch must appoint someone to lead the government. • Under Article 43(2)(a), the PM must belong to the Dewan Rakyat. • The PM must not be a citizen by naturalisation or registration (Article 43(7)). • The race, religion, region or gender of the nominee are not mandated by the law. Instead, the Constitution, in Article 8, calls for equality before the law. This is in contrast with the Constitutions of the nine Malay States, which are explicit that unless the Ruler makes an exception, the MB must be a Malay/Muslim. • The PM must, “in the judgment of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong”, be “likely to command the confidence of the majority of the members of the House”. This wording leads some commentators to believe that the Monarch has unlimited and subjective discretion in appointing the PM. Most respectfully, the absolute discretion theory is not in keeping with the scheme of a constitutional monarchy.
| 
本周最热论坛帖子
发表于 29-4-2021 05:17 PM
3951 
79
