|
|
发表于 3-5-2018 12:21 PM
|
显示全部楼层
几个字？还是你发过的帖，回复过的上万个字都是伺候某方面的言论？难道不是政治傀儡?看你八成都是以为社会主义-共产党主义。
算了，跟政治狂人回复，等于想一个被洗脑的人谈天。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 3-5-2018 12:32 PM
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 山林居民 于 3-5-2018 12:41 PM 编辑
社会主义，不流行了。名称被利用，和几乎专制，独裁，差不多。
现在讲福利主义。下层人民，希望有什么？不就多点生活福利罷了。
失业，会有保障。医疗保护。等等。其他，根本就废话。愚昧的家伙扯些诈骗言语。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 3-5-2018 12:32 PM
来自手机
|
显示全部楼层
wayne1004 发表于 3-5-2018 12:21 PM
几个字？还是你发过的帖，回复过的上万个字都是伺候某方面的言论？难道不是政治傀儡?看你八成都是以为社会主义-共产党主义。
算了，跟政治狂人回复，等于想一个被洗脑的人谈天。
有问题？俺的宗旨一向都是要队死国阵吧了！好没？算了！由衷一句，社会主义党好的转型去吧！不然真死路一条的！ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 3-5-2018 12:35 PM
来自手机
|
显示全部楼层
山林居民 发表于 3-5-2018 12:32 PM
社会主义，不流行了。名称被利用，和几乎专制，独裁，差不多。
现在讲福利主义。下层人民，希望有什么？不就多点生活福利罷了。
失业，会有保障。医疗保护。等等。其他，根本就废话。
所以重点就来了，那会谁要去发展找錢给予他们这些了！ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 3-5-2018 12:38 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 3-5-2018 12:58 PM
|
显示全部楼层
马来西亚自古被强国操控，改不了的命运，地理位置造成的，几乎没有一个是自创品牌。
君主立宪，英殖民地，日本，荷兰，葡萄牙，郑和伊斯兰，印度伊斯兰，中东伊斯兰，印度教，Langkasuka，Srivijaya....
跟强国主义，Followism。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 3-5-2018 01:10 PM
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 山林居民 于 3-5-2018 01:14 PM 编辑
文化相对落后地域人民，自然应该透过学习，提升自己。
民主，法治，是好东西。有人民群体设置自我治疗的机制模型。
不过需要人民，最少有一定的，最起码的文化启蒙。
这次大选，也是一种考验。文化启蒙是否有成绩。
和白痴讲高深道理，显然是非常耗力气的。
当然，改朝换代，急不容缓。
|
评分
-
查看全部评分
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 3-5-2018 01:31 PM
|
显示全部楼层
以前英国最强，跟英国。
80年代日本最强，跟日本。
马来西亚人节奏太慢了，跟，是很适合的。
无论什么人执政，还是要跟，地理条件好。 |
评分
-
查看全部评分
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 3-5-2018 03:02 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 4-5-2018 07:35 AM
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 山林居民 于 4-5-2018 07:45 AM 编辑
推荐过时的残品，必然浪费心机。劳民殇财。
拿一个“拳头”出来招摇，就已经吓坏乡下佬。
你说会赢吗？
西欧搞福利国，是比较成功。但是西欧人文化水平，相对比较高。实践相对简单。
我国，就有自己特殊条件，土著意识形态严重。不能照搬照抄。
凡事需要理性思考。需要知己知彼。对吗？？
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 4-5-2018 02:07 PM
|
显示全部楼层
Why does Pakatan prefer BN to PSM’s Dr Kumar in Sg Siput?
It is likely that Pakatan Harapan does not want any PSM MP to challenge their neo-liberal policies, raise rakyat-centred issues and socialist solutions. Kua Kia Soong, Free Malaysia Today
From the tears after the disqualification of Pakatan Harapan (PH) candidates at the nominations last week, there were regrets that Pakatan had conceded some seats even before election day.
But is Pakatan serious about ensuring the defeat of the BN and the installation of a better people-centred government with good peoples’ representatives? I wonder…
Dr Kumar (Dr Michael Jeyakumar) of PSM has been the Sg Siput Member of Parliament since 2008 and has won plaudits from many quarters as the model “peoples’ representative” in the Malaysian parliament who consistently raises national issues of development, issues affecting the peoples’ welfare as well as proposing solutions to these problems.
One would think that if Pakatan was seriously interested in winning GE14 at the national level, Sg Siput would be a safe deposit for the opposition.
But no, Pakatan has seen it fit to put up a candidate to split the vote that will inevitably lead to a BN victory. Samy Vellu’s toupee must have danced to his chuckles after the recent nominations.
Who is this PH candidate, Kesavan Subramaniam who is supposed to be a better representative for Sg Siput than Dr Kumar? Even if the Pakatan hacks have no objection to this blatant sabotage of the opposition chances in this GE14, what does civil society think about this shocking concession to BN by sacrificing Dr Kumar?
Those who have been breast-beating about the time for change must have some opinion about this shameful concession of a valuable seat in Sg Siput to BN!
Somehow, I don’t think defeating the BN is the prime concern of Pakatan. Could it be that they are prepared to sacrifice the seat to BN in order to ensure there is no PSM member of parliament to challenge their neo-liberal policies, raise rakyat-centred issues and socialist solutions that go beyond harping on about the scandals of the ruling coalition? Or perhaps PH MPs don’t like to be compared to Kumar as they feel their performance as parliamentarians can never measure up to his high standards?
And Sg Siput is not the only seat Pakatan is sacrificing in this election. They have likewise put up candidates in all the seats in which other PSM leaders are standing, for example, against Arul in Semenyih. Now, is Bakhtiar Mohd Nor of Parti Pribumi considered a better candidate than Arul for Semenyih? Really?
I would be interested to hear some response from civil society leaders who have been asking the Malaysian people to vote for change. They must have an opinion about candidates in Sg Siput and in Semenyih to raise but two examples. PSM candidates are challenged in all the seats they stand by PH.
As for the supposed veteran politicians who have been posturing about tsunamis in GE14, any amateur can tell you that in this election compared to all the elections since 1986, the expulsion of PAS from the opposition coalition can only spell better fortune for BN. Don’t they know?
“Its simple arithmetic, stupid!”
Kua Kia Soong is the adviser for SUARAM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 13-5-2018 05:25 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
社会主义党的候选人在第14届大选中全数丧失按柜金，再也古马也只得到千多票，社会主义党已经失去了生存的意义 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 本周最热论坛帖子
|
1693 
68
