大马外交官在纽西兰被控意图强奸，逃回大马受保护？

tlsk

也许人家上任前把”外交“和“性交”搞混乱了。。。

wrm95

sinovic 发表于 1-7-2014 07:26 AM
沐猴而冠。

“沐猴而冠”与“衣冠禽兽”有别，可形容坏人；也可形容好人；

“衣冠禽兽”就只能形容坏人。

所以我认为后者比较适合

Barryliaozs

不要质疑，我国向来喜欢包庇罪犯。

gaomin

还是听听阿尼法怎样讲。

ttc18

cchoong 发表于 1-7-2014 04:07 AM
说起来上次也有一位大人物在外国赌场借钱赌,输了没还逃了回来!后面发展如何呢?有谁知道吗?

赌场越洋起诉，最后在狗阵真腐干涉之下庭外和解还钱了事！不过那条大人物也失去了一方诸侯的位子！

gundamwing

因为在纽西兰无法使用国阵精神

hellolee

pitseng 发表于 1-7-2014 08:53 AM
505  之前不是有位巫统部长也是有强奸女佣

那个后来不了了之，没敢追究了。因为女佣家属担心她成为第二个蒙古女郎，说算了，怕惹不起。蒙古女郎让很多受害者都望而却步。现在有点担心纽西兰那位女性会不会有事。

ET_NYK

呸...呸...呸...呸...呸...呸...呸...呸...呸...呸...呸...

yming2475

上一次发生在台湾 。。

mizzle

無言啊. 擔心新西蘭的司法不夠大馬司法公正?

yihleh

可能只是纯粹公干而已，不是女干。。。

angrybird582

z教都已经一天祈祷五次。。。五次。。。。五次
z教都已经一天祈祷五次。。。五次。。。。五次

z教都已经一天祈祷五次。。。五次。。。。五次



z教都已经一天祈祷五次。。。五次。。。。五次


z教都已经一天祈祷五次。。。五次。。。。五次
、
还是kentoi

ben987

'意图‘强奸？

硬不起来所以没成功？

性侵犯在至高无上的回教国只是小事而已，很容易settle的。

sinovic

wrm95 发表于 1-7-2014 09:54 AM
“沐猴而冠”与“衣冠禽兽”有别，可形容坏人；也可形容好人；

“衣冠禽兽”就只能形容坏人。

我支持你的言论呵呵

我是无赖

不错不错。。。往往都出名到国外的

robbins123

http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/ ... sian-diplomat-namedhttp://www.stuff.co.nz/national/ ... sian-diplomat-named

新西兰新闻。该外交官员的名字已被透露。

digiambassador

到时可能会娶了受害者了事？？？

leihaiyun

kimmun 发表于 1-7-2014 03:02 AM
外"交"官

全是hamsap 的滥交官。。。。

让大马人民蒙羞。。国耻。。。

马来西亚

robbins123 发表于 1-7-2014 11:52 AM
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/10219574/Sex-accused-Malaysian-diplomat-namedhttp://www.stu ...

link 被 block le

robbins123

A High Court judge has lifted the suppression order shielding a Malaysian diplomat accused of a sex offence in Wellington.

The diplomat is Muhammad Rizalman bin Ismail from Malaysia. Ismail, who holds the military rank of warrant officer, was a staff assistant with a defence portfolio at the Malaysian high commission.

It is understood he may face a military board of inquiry in Malaysia.

Justice David Collins said he would give his reasons later in writing.

MALAYSIAN COMMUNITY EMBARRASSED

New Zealand Malaysian Society spokesman Selva Ramasari said the community was embarrassed and shocked by what had happened.

It was also disappointing that it had taken the Malaysian government so long to front up.

"It's quite embarrassing for the community because after the MH370 saga we constantly seem to be someone who can't handle the situation, it's critical to the image of the nation and I don't think this is going to help the situation.

"I'm quite disappointed with the approach. I believe the immunity gained by the defendant is not meant to be for this sort of personal crime, it's more for political or other reasons why we have the immunity."

Ramasari said Ismail should return to New Zealand to face the charges against him and should not be allowed to remain in Malaysia.

"When the news breaks out it's going to be very difficult for the Malaysian community (in New Zealand), especially with Muslims now being in the month of Ramadan, it's bad timing.

'A WIN FOR FREE SPEECH'

Robert Stewart, lawyer for Fairfax Media, which appealed Ismail's name suppression, said it was a win for free speech.

He said the judge's decision made sense because New Zealand would have been in a vacuum until Malaysia's foreign ministry made a statement at 4pm.

"It would mean media here would be at risk of prosecution for breaching the interim suppression order if it had been allowed to stand so I think it's a sensible recognition of the fact that we don't live in a goldfish bowl."

"It would have put the media in an impossible position and the temptation would have been too great."

"There is a need for suppression orders from time to time to ensure that justice is administered fairly but when events conspire to mean that those suppression orders are really useless or don't make any sense or are not having the effect that they're intended to have then they should be revoked and that's what's happened today."

Suppression was originally given to assist the defendant make sense of what was happening. Hence, it was understandable on an interim basis but later events meant the basis for that order no longer existed and the judge recognised that, Stewart said.

Ad Feedback

It showed that diplomats were treated the same as anyone else in New Zealand.

HASTY SUPPRESSION APPEAL HEARING

Justice Collins heard the hastily convened appeal against a suppression order made in the Wellington District Court.

Ismail, aged in his 30s, was not represented at the hearing but lawyer Barbara Hunt has been appointed by the court to assist if necessary.

Justice Collins confirmed the understanding that the man had first appeared in the District Court on May 10 where two justices of the peace granted suppression. A court registrar continued the suppression on May 15 when police said issues of diplomatic immunity were being looked into.

The case was before District Court judge Bruce Davidson on May 30 when the order was continued.

For the police, Wellington Crown solicitor Grant Burston said the appeal was not opposed.

Burston said there was no connection between the defendant and the alleged victim so there was no risk of her being identified if the defendant was named.

There was no risk to a fair trial given diplomatic immunity was claimed and the defendant was not in New Zealand in any event.

There did not appear to have been an evidential basis for the suppression order being continued on May 30. Police had not opposed it then because the case was still at a very early stage and there was a statutory obligation to treat diplomats with consideration.

Hunt said she had been the duty lawyer who had appeared for the man when he first appeared in court on a Saturday morning. Diplomatic immunity was not mentioned at that stage.

Hunt had earlier told the court that her instructions at that first court appearance had been to get a remand without plea, make an application for legal aid, and ask for name suppression.

Ismail's employer and others were in court to support him but at that stage he had no information about the nature of the charges against him.

She said she was concerned that suppression was being decided without him having the opportunity to be heard.

Suppression had been sought for Ismail to tell his family of the charges and because of the serious nature of the charges.

MALAYSIAN MEDIA REPORTING

Earlier today reports in the Malaysian news media said Ismail's foreign minister said he could be returned if he was promised a fair trial and his life was not in danger.

Prime Minister John Key said before the suppression hearing that he wanted Ismail tried here.

"We sent a very strong message that we didn't want him sent home."

Key said Ismail would get a fair trial in New Zealand and his life would not be in danger.

"We don't have the death penalty in New Zealand and he'll absolutely get a free and fair trial in New Zealand. One thing that we can pride ourselves in is having a judicial system that's completely fair."

New Zealand's Foreign Minister Murray McCully said he had seen the media reports. His officials in the Malaysia's capital were "making inquiries" in an attempt to clarify the situation.

McCully said having Ismail returned would require a process but "I'm sure that would be one course that would be followed up by the authorities".

It was possible that the man could be extradited to New Zealand; however this would require Malaysia to effectively reverse its previous position that it wanted the man to invoke diplomatic immunity. It would be a matter for other authorities to act on this possibility once the situation was clarified, McCully said.

"These are things that are not decided by Ministers but by prosecutorial authorities, so this matter would be a matter for them to consider and I'm sure they'd be watching this quite closely."

Earlier today McCully warned that if the diplomat did not face the charges, it would affect relations between the two countries.