|
|
楼主 |
发表于 5-1-2012 06:33 PM
|
显示全部楼层
A 48-year-old neighbour of the brutal murder victims in Sibu was arrested for questioning after police has found strong evidence linking him with the crime.
ppr350 发表于 5-1-2012 06:25 PM  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 5-1-2012 07:13 PM
|
显示全部楼层
A 48-year-old neighbour of the brutally murdered victims in Sibu was arrested for questioning after police have found strong evidence linking him with the crime.
有没有改到? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
楼主 |
发表于 5-1-2012 08:33 PM
|
显示全部楼层
A 48-year-old neighbour of the brutally murdered victims in Sibu was arrested for questioning after police have found strong evidence linking him with the crime.
ppr350 发表于 5-1-2012 07:13 PM 
还有....这里的 police 应该是指警方：the police
那个人都还没定罪，也没在现场作案被逮着，应该不适合用逮捕/arrest 吧？
可能只是被带回去/扣留/召唤...问话如：was held/summoned/detained for interrogation
linking to......，with 也可以 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 5-1-2012 09:10 PM
|
显示全部楼层
还有一个很重要/明显的......
还有....这里的 police 应该是指警方：the police
那个人都还没定罪，也没 ...
风满楼 发表于 5-1-2012 20:33
被你一说才恍然大悟！通常“差佬”只会在案发现场才会和嫌疑犯说“You are under arrest”。
A 48-year-old neighbour of the brutally murdered victims in Sibu was held for questioning after the police have found crucial evidence linking him with the crime.
还有一个错误是不是evidence不能用strong来形容？ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
楼主 |
发表于 5-1-2012 10:01 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 6-1-2012 12:22 AM
|
显示全部楼层
Detentions are shorter in duration and scope than arrest, and require a lower burden of proof.
If I have Reasonable Suspicion that a crime has or is about to occur, and reasonably believe that a person may have information about this, I can detain them for a short period of time to investigate the matter. As part of my investigation, I can conduct a pat down for weapons (if I reasonably believe that they may be present) and seek information to determine exactly what is, has, or will happen. The timeframe can vary a bit due to each set of circumstances, but 20 minutes or so has been ruled to be a reasonable timeframe for detaining someone.
If I have Probable Cause to believe a specific person has committed a crime, I can arrest that person. At that point, I can conduct a complete search of their person for weapons, evidence, and contraband, as well as their vehcile if they are or have been near it recently. I can remove them from the scene and hold them (in jail) for 24 hours or until I get a warrant issued for the charges.
If anyone resists an arrest or detention, I am authorized to use force to apprehend them (in addition, resisting an arrest or detention is a crime, so resisting immediately gives me probable cause to make an arrest).
Normally I don't have to use any "meaningful" physical force to restrain someone I am detaining or arresting. Most people cooperate on their own.
A person can usually tell (with me) because I'll tell them when they are under arrest. If a case arises when I handcuff someone who is merely detained, I will tell them, "You're not under arrest at this time; you are being detained while I investigate what's going on."
Hope that clarifies things-
Citicop.
http://www.realpolice.net/forums ... ed-vs-arrested.html
如果有strong evidence的话，应该可以用arrest吧。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 6-1-2012 12:32 AM
|
显示全部楼层
这题没辙吗？
Some movies are good and the others are completely a different story.
=》Some mov ...
风满楼 发表于 3-1-2012 07:26 PM 
明白，就是说，如果前部分没有指定，后面就不能用definite article "the"
我还以为" some movies" 已经是指定了"movies"这个范围
如果
Some Hong Kong movies are good and the others ...
这样可以吗？
还是要
Some of the Hong Kong movies are good and the others...
另外，and 可不可以或者需不需要换成but? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 6-1-2012 02:05 AM
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 ppr350 于 6-1-2012 02:39 AM 编辑
是不是这样？（我朋友的答案）
A 48-year-old neighbour of the brutally murdered victims in Sibu was held for questioning after the police had found strong evidence linking him with the crime. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 6-1-2012 07:10 AM
|
显示全部楼层
我姐姐的答案：
A 48-year-old, neighbour of the brutally murdered victims in Sibu was held for questioning after the police have found strong evidence linking him with the crime. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
楼主 |
发表于 6-1-2012 08:08 AM
|
显示全部楼层
如果有strong evidence的话，应该可以用arrest吧。
stan24ley 发表于 6-1-2012 12:22 AM 
明白，就是说，如果前部分没有指定，后面就不能用definite article "the"
我还以为" some movies" 已经是指定了"movies"这个范围
Some Hong Kong movies are good and the others ...
这样可以吗？
还是要
Some of the Hong Kong movies are good and the others...
指定的一些电影则需要说 the movies，如：some of the movies I have seen... some of the Hong Kong movies I have seen
用 and 应该没错....可以联想一些类似的句子，如：
Some of the students are Asians and the others are Africans. 用 but 的话似乎不恰当。其实那个句子是说：有些电影很好，而其他的则不是那样。而=and...... 哈哈，这个我也不知道如何解释，最好还是去参考 and 和 but 的定义再判断哪个比较适合。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
楼主 |
发表于 6-1-2012 08:17 AM
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 风满楼 于 6-1-2012 08:19 AM 编辑
是不是这样？（我朋友的答案）
A 48-year-old neighbour of the brutally murdered victims in Sibu was held for questioning after the police had found strong evidence linking him with the crime.
ppr350 发表于 6-1-2012 02:05 AM
先发生（过去的过去）：had found
后发生（过去）：was arrested
还有原版的 brutal murder victims 真的很离谱，不管词性东拼西凑的。
——————————————————————————————————————————————————
最初我以为这是砂州的英文报章的报道，感到很震惊，但后来发现这只是私人网站的报道，那就无法要求他的英文水平了，而作者自己也承认自己的英语问题：
A reporter, now blogging full timeEditing in BM and write "broken" Malaysian English.Write whatever am feels like |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 6-1-2012 08:35 AM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
楼主 |
发表于 6-1-2012 08:38 AM
|
显示全部楼层
忘了补充：
after 一词已可以清楚分辨两件事的前后次序，所以用 found 也没错：
...neighbour... was held.... after the police found strong evidence... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
楼主 |
发表于 6-1-2012 10:45 AM
|
显示全部楼层
新题：
You're welcomed to stay for a dinner. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 6-1-2012 10:55 AM
|
显示全部楼层
新题：
You're welcomed to stay for a dinner.
风满楼 发表于 6-1-2012 10:45 AM
You're welcome to stay for the dinner吗？ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
楼主 |
发表于 6-1-2012 11:23 AM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
楼主 |
发表于 6-1-2012 11:25 AM
|
显示全部楼层
题外话：
那起冷血命案好像已经破了，凶手是隔壁邻居的十七岁男孩，他是从天花板潜入邻家干案的...... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
楼主 |
发表于 6-1-2012 11:27 AM
|
显示全部楼层
You're welcome to stay for the dinner吗？
泪王子 发表于 6-1-2012 10:55 AM
这题好像太简单了.....
You're welcome to stay for dinner. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 6-1-2012 01:56 PM
|
显示全部楼层
这题好像太简单了.....
You're welcome to stay for dinner.
风满楼 发表于 6-1-2012 11:27 AM
所以加 the 是大错特错么？
假设情况：
A: I'm gonna make XXXX for dinner, and blah blah blah..
B: Wow sounds great.
(blahh)
A: you're welcome to stay for dinner （也不可以加the?） |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 6-1-2012 05:02 PM
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 我是坏孩子 于 6-1-2012 05:05 PM 编辑
坏孩子missed鸟几题! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 本周最热论坛帖子
|
2850 
73
