各为大大救命,,,,,这是个奇怪的问题

Who_am_I_85

因为一家私人企业,搞了某中不名物体升空的发射,结果导致,附近的住宅区受到震动.
不幸的是,住宅区的屋子受到震动的影响,而出现裂痕.

同时,海边也因为这间公司丢弃有毒物,而受到污染.
因为这样,海边餐馆的经营者,因为海边的污染,而生意受到影响.

现在,住宅区里屋子出现裂痕的屋主和海边餐馆的经营者,要向这家私人企业要求赔偿损失.


小弟是个超笨的学生,希望各位大大能给于小弟一点提示.
1) 请问各位大大,除了under tort, sue defendan negligence 和 nuisance. pihak plaintif 还能带什么cause of action??

2) 请问各位大大,for pihak defendan,有什么defence可以用??
请问如果我用Environment impact assessment来reduce liability,行得通吗?
请问海边一定属于政府的吗? 餐馆有locu standi 来sue吗??

请问有那位大大能给我Environment impact assessment的format吗?


请各位大大尽量给我珍贵的意见.小弟绝不会因为意见出错而你.感激不尽,在此先谢谢各位大大.

虫皇

emmmm...不知道对不对的阿，错了表鸟我啊，我会哭的。试试看而已。。

ryland v fletcher - Blackburn J:"a person who, FOR HIS OWN PURPOSE, BRINGS on his land and keeps these ANYTHING LIKELY TO CAUSE MISCHIEF IF IT ESCAPES, must do so at his peril, and if he does not do so, he is prima facie answerable for all damage which is the natural consequances of its escape."

个人看法：D在空中发射不明物体和丢弃废物（brought something to land， unatural use of land, dangerous and likely to cause damage if escape from land, there's an escape of the dangerous thing，damage as a result of escape）

Who_am_I_85

回复 2# 虫皇


    首先,本人先谢谢你. 我赞同你所讲的是strict liability.

Who_am_I_85

有人能帮我给一点defendan的意见吗